Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2016, the Defendant, as distributed in Seocho-gu, around 12:20 on August 12, 2016, at the entrance of the second floor of the Seocho Police Station in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that the Defendant was arrested by slope C belonging to the Seocho Police Station in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and the police officer was arrested by a fine twice, and that the Defendant was fluored by a police officer, who was going to the Seocho Police Station in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and was fluored by her own sound on the ground that he was fluored, she was fluored, and that he was not fluord, and that he was not fluored by her arms.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the arrest of designated winners;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act has a record of being punished several times for the same crime, the sentence is ordered in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant recognized the crime and reflects the defendant; (b) the degree of exercise of tangible power is relatively minor; (c) the victimized police officer does not want the punishment against the defendant; (d) the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime; and (e) records such as the circumstances after the crime; and (e) the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of the case.