logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 12. 28. 선고 2018두57230 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 토지의 양도에 관한 이 사건 부과처분은 부과제척기간이 지나 이루어진 처분으로서 무효임[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu 39425 (Law No. 23, 2018)

Title

(D) The disposition of this case on the transfer of the land of this case shall be null and void after the expiration of the exclusion period of imposition.

Summary

The plaintiff's act of submitting a explanatory statement stating false facts to the defendant cannot be viewed as "Fraud or other unlawful act in imposing transfer income tax on the land of this case which the plaintiff acquired originally."

Related statutes

Period for exclusion of imposition of national taxes under Article 26-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2018Du52230 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA

Defendant-Appellee

BB Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu39425 Decided August 23, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow