logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2017.11.23 2017나21896
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On November 30, 2015, Defendant C, and H sent the instant lease agreement to the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) Defendant C, G, and H expressed no intention to terminate the instant lease agreement; (b) Defendant C, G, and H expressed no intention to do so; (c) Defendant C, G, and H expressed no intention to cancel the instant lease agreement; (d) Defendant C, G, and H sent the instant certificate of No. 31-223 (136 pages December 22, 2016), No. 32-2, No. 32-2, No. 38, and No. 39; and (e) Defendant C and H expressed no intention to recover to the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (c) Defendant C sent the instant certificate of intention to cancel the lease agreement to the Plaintiff on November 30, 2015; and (d) Defendant C sent it to the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (c) Defendant C sent the instant certificate of intention to reinstate to the Plaintiff on December 17, 2015, 201.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just based on the conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow