logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.08.14 2017가단19554
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) from August 15, 2017, entry in the separate sheet.

Reasons

In the absence of dispute between the parties, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, and the purport of the pleading before the pleading, the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) as to July 28, 2017, KRW 500,000,000 on the date of the contract, and the remainder shall be the same year.

8. The following facts are established: (a) the monthly rent of KRW 500,000,00 for the period of delivery; (b) the lease agreement was concluded between August 15, 2017 and August 14, 2019 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”); (c) the Defendant occupied the instant building from August 15, 2017 to the present date; (d) the Defendant paid KRW 1.5 million out of the deposit to the agreed date; and (e) the Defendant did not pay the agreed rent at all on November 15, 2017; and (e) the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a document verifying the content of the instant lease that the instant lease was terminated on the grounds of unpaid payment of the Defendant’s deposit balance and the delivery of the said mail to the Defendant around that time.

According to the above facts, around November 15, 2017, the contents-certified mail stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination was delivered to the Defendant, and the instant lease agreement was lawfully rescinded on the grounds of the Defendant’s non-payment of deposit for lease.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff, and pay the Plaintiff money at the rate of KRW 500,000 per month from August 15, 2017 to the completion date of the delivery of the said building and the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent.

Plaintiff

claim shall be accepted.

arrow