A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 01:20, at the Jeju City B and 2nd floor; (b) the Defendant, as a matter of the drinking value, came to engage in the instant singing tele business, and (c) in the process, reported to 112 by the said proprietor; and (d) four police officers, such as the Jeju Western Police Station D Zone E, who received the report, were dispatched to the Republic of Korea.

At around 01:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses from the foregoing E to calculate the drinking value and return to the house, and (b) assaulted E, such as “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am., and am. I am...

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph, 112 Reporting List;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution: Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties according to the sentencing guidelines shall be limited to the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties, six months to one year and six months;

2. Determination of sentence is recognized, and there is no punishment after 202. Other factors such as the circumstances of the crime, the degree of the assault, the conduct after the crime, etc.