A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in Seoul Southern District Court on March 10, 2014 and completed the execution of the sentence.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant: (a) committed theft as an employee of the D Operation “E company” of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building 909; (b) stolen a cellular phone auxiliary distribution device that the victim F is entrusted to D with custody; and (c) intended to dispose of it.

At around 17:35 on May 16, 2015, the Defendant, who entered the above “E company” office, and was in custody of the office, committed theft with the amount equivalent to KRW 23,270,000 on the 3rd mobile phone auxiliary 2,600 on the market price of 23,600.

B. Around 19:00 on May 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered the above “E company” office; and (b) took a theft with the victim F-owned mobile phone 7 mobile phone auxiliary 62,650 won at the 7th market price, which was kept in the office.

C. At around 11:30 on May 30, 2015, the Defendant, entering the above “E company” office, and stolen the victim F-owned mobile phone 550 market value equivalent to KRW 17,69,00, and KRW 13,801,50 at T2 mobile phone 450 market value.

At around 20:00 on June 5, 2015, the Defendant entered the above “E company” office and stolen the victim F 1,180,000 mobile phone auxiliary distribution market price of 32,180,000, T20 mobile phone auxiliary distribution market price of 3,067,00, and T3 mobile phone auxiliary distribution market price of 8,950,000, respectively.

2. The Defendant forged a private document: (a) the Defendant disposed of stocks to G that purchased a mobile phone auxiliary tamper stated in paragraphs (1) and (3) of Article 1; (b) the Defendant purchased all the remaining mobile phone auxiliary tamper; and (c) was willing to forge the power of attorney in the name of D in order to see as if he had the authority to dispose of the person who was requested by G to submit a proxy name.

The defendant.