Imprisonment with prison labor for each crime listed in the order of 2016, the order of 2017, the order of 2017, the order of 1.6 months, the order of 2016, the order of 5889, the ruling of 2016.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution due to a crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Offenses Act at the Seoul Western District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 12, 2015.

[2016 Highest 979]

1. The Defendant, from the first floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, operates “F”, a distributor, such as ED lighting, by lending the name of E.

On January 19, 2015, the Defendant, at the above F Office around January 19, 2015, would pay the amount to G, which is a senior executive director of the victim C, a manufacture company, such as LED lighting, in good faith.

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant receives goods from the injured party, he/she takes measures such as offering them as security, and the bill delivered as the price for the goods to the injured party is a forged bill, and there was no intention or ability to repay the price for the goods to the bad credit holder without any special property or income.

On January 19, 2015, the Defendant received from the injured party a supply of the amount equivalent to KRW 212,00,000 at the market price of Class 2 and around January 19, 2015, as indicated in the list of crimes in Annex 1, all of the Defendant received a supply of the amount of KRW 103,275,40,00 in total from around 18 times until May 4, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2016 Highest 5889]

2. On December 2015, the Defendant embezzled and transferred the bill to “K”, which is the business partner of the Defendant, by endorsement and transfer around January 2016, when the Defendant kept the bill at the victim H at the face value of KRW 10 million, the issuer I Co., Ltd., and the bill number J with the request.

[2017 Highest 86]

3. The Defendant is a person who operated a wholesale and retail business with the trade name “M” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L and 102.

A. On January 25, 2016, the Defendant submitted a list of total tax invoices by false entries in the sales office against the said M at the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu tax office.