All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (the factual error) ① The first and second accidents that are close to the time of the occurrence are proved to be different from the driver’s behavior of the general driver. ② The details of Defendant A’s driving experience and accident, Defendant A’s assertion on the background of the occurrence of the accident are identical to the assertion in the previous accident of Defendant B’s Eastern P, ③ The vehicle of Defendant B purchased in a discount and refused the return of the vehicle without paying the installment cost, and was accused of interference with the exercise of rights by the financial company. The vehicle of this case was the vehicle of this case. Defendant B did not repair the said vehicle after the first accident and used the unpaid repair money without repairing it, and caused the accident again and neglected it after about 6 months thereafter. ④ The vehicle of the Defendant A purchased with the part of the vehicle of this case, and Defendant A failed to pay the installment cost at time after the first accident, and the lower court found the Defendants not guilty as to the whole of the accident after the second accident in collusion with the investigation agency.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s determination is difficult to easily see that: (a) the type of traffic accident is very diverse and diverse scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamsscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscams