1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendants were trying to purchase a secondhand vehicle in their own name and could not purchase it in their own name, and the Plaintiff requested that the Defendants pay an installment on behalf of the Defendants, if they purchased a secondhand vehicle in the name of the Plaintiff and then purchased a new car in the name of the Plaintiff in 12,95,407. Accordingly, on April 11, 2008, the Plaintiff purchased a new car in 12,99,407.

However, the Defendants did not pay the said share of the said car once and paid all the said money by April 15, 2010. The Defendants are obliged to pay KRW 12,95,407 to the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff.

2. It is not sufficient to acknowledge that the Defendants agreed to pay the premium for the passenger car in the Plaintiff’s name solely on the basis of each description of the Plaintiff’s No. 1-1 and No. 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the Plaintiff’s above assertion cannot be accepted.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.