logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.12.03 2015고단1127
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM7 car.

1. On August 26, 2015, at around 21:27, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as “accident”) (hereinafter referred to as “D”), the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.118 percent of the blood alcohol concentration, and led the Defendant to bypass the front of the “D” located in Gangseo-si C, Gangwon-si, to the intersection of the Corporation.

At night and where there are many vehicles at the edge of the road, the defendant, who is engaged in driving duties, has a duty of care to safely operate the vehicle parked at the edge of the road by checking well the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop immediately and did not stop and take necessary measures, even though he has damaged the part of the back of the driver's seat on the side of the Defendant's vehicle to the right side of the Defendant's vehicle, which was parked on the side of the road due to the negligence of bypassing it as it was, and the latter part of the driver's seat on the side of the vehicle.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) caused the said accident and, at around 21:30 on the same day, had the Defendant run the road front of the “H pharmacy” located in Gangseo-si G with the Defendant’s vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.118 percent due to a difficult driving.

At the time, it was difficult to secure the view at night, and the place was the road around the intersection, so in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had the duty of care to safely operate the motor vehicle by checking well the right and the right of the front and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle due to negligence, which led to the Defendant’s failure to drive the victim I (the 41-year-old driver) in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, shocked the back part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle.

arrow