The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

After compiling evidence, the court below acknowledged the facts as stated in its decision, and rejected the defendant's assertion that the obligation to pay the remainder of the plaintiff and the obligation to transfer the ownership of the defendant to a concurrent performance relationship, and even if the defendant completed the principal registration based on the provisional registration of this case with respect to each land of this case to A, the above registration was null and void because it did not go through legitimate settlement procedures in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of the Provisional Registration Security Act, and the defendant's obligation to transfer ownership under the contract of this case was impossible.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as to concurrent performance relations, omission of judgment, incomplete hearing, and non-exercise of right to explanation.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.