Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a C chartered bus.

On March 31, 2016, around 19:20, the Defendant driving the said vehicle at the seat of the Do Do Do Do-si, which is a Do Do Do Do-si, Sim-si, Macheon-si, and made the left turn to the left.

At the time, there is an intersection where the signal at night is installed, and in particular, in the case of left-hand turn, the crosswalk and the pedestrian signal are installed at the entrance of the right-hand side, so the defendant engaged in driving of the vehicle has a duty of care to drive the vehicle safely by checking well whether the pedestrian and pedestrians are walking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not confirm whether or not pedestrians and proceeded to the left without confirming whether or not pedestrians, and received the victim D (51) who was a victim who dried up the crosswalk from the front door of the bus to the ethrode in accordance with the Ma- pursuant to Ethical of Green Pedestrians, and was able to get the victim D (51) who dried up the crosswalk from the front door of the bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “an injury from an external wound,” which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence, such as “an injury from an external wound with no wife in the open two markets.”

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement by the defendant partially made to the effect that he/she was injured by a victim while making a left-hand turn at the narrow intersection as at the date of holding;

1. The legal statement of witness E and D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Determination on the assertion of innocence between the defendant and his/her defense counsel

1. The summary of the argument and the defense counsel met the victim in the facts charged of this case, not the crosswalk at the location where the defendant shocked the victim, but the defendant's vehicle driving in the direction of the vehicle. At the time of the judgment of the court below, the pedestrian signal at the time of the judgment of the court below is sufficient.