The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who drives a C towing Vehicle on duty.

On March 23, 2008, at around 20:50, the above motor vehicle is driven by the driver of the above motor vehicle and proceeds from the surface of the permission test site in front of the new apartment at the front of the Mag-dong Mag-dong Mag-dong Mag-dong,

In the face of a new brupt, it was turned out.

Since this location is an intersection where a signal, etc. is operated and a crosswalk exists, a driver is negligent in performing the duty of care to check whether a person is a pedestrian crossing and to safely drive the crosswalk in accordance with the signals such as signal, etc., and in spite of the fact that the duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk, and the signal such as the signal is a stop signal in the direction of the defendant's proceeding. When the signal of the crosswalk is a pedestrian signal, the signal of the crosswalk is neglected, and the driver's DNA (54 years old, female) who walkes the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the right side of the driver's seat of the above vehicle operated by the defendant to the left side of the driver's seat of the above vehicle.

Due to the above shock, the victim suffered injury to the crypinitis that requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant, while making a left turn at the entrance of the modern apartment located in front of the above modern apartment, was facing the left turn pursuant to the left turn signals at the entrance of the modern apartment located in front of the above modern apartment, left the crosswalk near the center line, and coming to the left by the left, the Defendant was shocking the victim who walked on the left by leaving the crosswalk at the point away from the 3-4 sloping country, so the instant accident was not the signal violation and crosswalk, but the charge is denied.

The evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case is the victim's statement and the victim's fact of accident E.

E's fact-finding confirmation Board is written on the basis of the defendant's statement and does not clearly indicate that the point of accident is on the crosswalk.