1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 13, 2012 to November 10, 2016; and (b) the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. When the Plaintiff’s father was detained on the ground that the Plaintiff acquired insurance benefits of the National Health Insurance Corporation KRW 67 million in the course of operating the D Hospital located in Busan Seo-gu, the Plaintiff asked the Plaintiff to sell medical equipment, such as X-ra photographing equipment, installed in the operation room of the above hospital, and the Plaintiff took medical equipment at the operation room around January 27, 2012.

B. On February 17, 2012, E, as the founder and representative of the pertinent hospital, followed the victim by whom he/she was the principal and representative of the said hospital, and had F report the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff’s intrusion into the structure and theft suspicion.

C. After July 13, 2012, police officers belonging to the publicity office of the Busan Regional Police Agency distributed news report materials stating the purport that the Plaintiff was arrested in the Gu office of Busan, and that the media including the newspaper company and the broadcasting company applied for a prior warrant of detention to the Plaintiff on the basis of the news report materials of this case on July 13, 2013, on the basis of newspaper and website, etc. on which the Plaintiff applied for a prior warrant of detention against the Plaintiff based on the news report materials of this case, on the ground that the Plaintiff invaded into the operating office of the above hospital and sold the medical equipment of the hospital representative and the medical life cooperative, which are the assets of the hospital.

However, the Plaintiff did not have been subject to emergency arrest prior to the distribution of the above news report material, and did not have been subject to a general investigation with E or F, and there was no request for detention warrant after the distribution of the above news report material. Only E did it relate to the fact of being accused against the Plaintiff to the police prior to the distribution of the above news report material.