Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 17, 2016, at the E-cafeteria operated by the victim D, the Defendant, around 17:40 on the 17th day of the 17th day of the 2016 North Korea-do, the Defendant, despite the fact that the Defendant was not an environmental source, but is not scheduled to go to the night, the Defendant stated that “the Defendant is an environmental U.S. source to collect sofing food, and requests the payment of drinking water even if it is a drinking water,” and that the Defendant was issued KRW 20,000 in cash from the victim’s seat.

2. Around August 17, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s neck in front of the G restaurant located in the Donsan-si, Donsan-do, G Donsan-do, as described in paragraph 1 of this Article, at the end of the G Donsan-si, the Defendant: (a) sealed the fact that he belongs to the Defendant; (b) opened the string door of the vehicle on which the Defendant was aboard; and (c) opened the string door of the vehicle on which the Defendant was aboard; and (d) string the victim’s right part of the blue part of the victim’s blue by keeping the blue door so far as it is unfolded; and (b) string the victim’s flue by cutting the blue,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [the aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes which are heavier than punishment (to the extent that it is aggregated with the maximum amount of the punishment specified in the above two crimes)];

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is disadvantageous to the defendant, who has many records of the same kind of crime.

The amount of money obtained by the defendant is not so much, and the sentencing conditions shown in arguments, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive, means and result of the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered by considering the following circumstances.