logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.18 2016고단1570
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws at the Seoul Central District Court on September 10, 201, and the probation period becomes final and conclusive on December 18, 2014.

1. A person who is engaged in driving of a Genz car in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident).

On April 13, 2016, around 02:20 on April 13, 2016, the Defendant moved back the back road in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H to a speed that cannot be seen as the Cheongcheon apartment protection area from the cU solar datum.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as keeping the traffic situation well and accurately operating the steering gear and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was due to the negligence of failing to live well in the front room, and the Defendant received the victim I(60)-K5, a taxi vehicle in front of the driver's seat of the Defendant, which was moving into the Cheongcheon apartment site in the front room of Taewon-won.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed or suspended a victim vehicle with approximately KRW 700,00,000 for repair costs, thereby checking the damage situation or escaping without taking necessary measures, such as reporting on the cause of the traffic accident.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) started from the road 26 km-ro, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul and driven a Gbenz car without a driver’s license, starting from the road 27 km-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and driving a vehicle at approximately 2 km-ro to the same place.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act should not operate a motor vehicle on the road, even though it is required not to operate the motor vehicle on which mandatory insurance was not subscribed, and the motor vehicle at the time and place indicated in paragraph 2 is not covered by mandatory insurance.

arrow