logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.08 2016고단2153
위증
Text

Defendant

G shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant G.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s attempt to receive money under the pretext of loan money by asserting that he/she was charged with secondary values and money, etc., and received money on April 8, 201, and received money by transfer from D as borrowed money by stating that “The money is short of KRW 10 million if the money is to be distributed by rapid means to the present house,” and received money from D for the purpose of borrowing money. On December 9, 2015, Defendant A was indicted with the Busan District Court and tried to have it tried to request false testimony from G, who is the seater, with the intention of asking for false testimony.

3. Between the first police officer and the first police officer, G calls to G on the land below Busan Metropolitan City, and “Nin D was at the time of our house, and the first police officer had lent his son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

The phrase “D” caused G to feel a false testimony.

As a result, G appeared in the Busan District Court No. 253, Mar. 10, 2016, at the Busan District Court No. 251, which was located in the Busan District Court No. 253, the Busan District Court of Law No. 2015, 7986, as a witness of the fraud defendant's case, and "D was met at the defendant's house, at the time of coming to the defendant's house, D would be punished for embezzlement of company money, so that D could be punished for embezzlement of company money at its own expense.

“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact that D only lent 10 million won to the defendant, and D did not call that D could be punished for the company's embezzlement of money at the expense of 10 million won, and D could not be viewed as G where D would give 10 million won to the defendant, and there was no fact that D had been contacted at the defendant's house before the defendant received money from D.

Accordingly, the Defendant instigated G to give false testimony against his memory.

2...

arrow