logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단2364
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On October 31, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and was released on August 14, 2015 and the parole period expired on September 25, 2015 during the execution of the sentence.

【Criminal facts” On February 27, 2017, the Defendant conspiredd to acquire money under the name of the elderly as if he had been aware of prior to and against two women in the old-age market located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan-do, and as if he had attempted to do so for the above female elderly, he would have attempted to do so for the above female elderly.

Accordingly, on February 28, 2017, two women who are not named above are approaching the victim C (V, 80 years of age) in the vicinity of the bus terminal in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do and " there is a dispute over the surrounding areas."

, whether or not;

One point issue is the building side of the road, and the other point issue should be solved even though it is possible to do so.

"A person who suffers from a traffic accident" by making a false statement to the defendant, and the defendant is under the influence of a traffic accident, and the victim "a child may have a traffic accident, and the victim must enter the mountain.

It made a false statement to the effect that she would request 3,000,000 won.

However, since the defendant was not in a dispute, it was false that he was involved in a traffic accident, received money from the injured party, and thought that he was to use money for living expenses, etc., and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to do so for the injured party.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 2,000,000 won from the injured party under the pretext of seat, namely, from the injured party.

As a result, the defendant was delivered property by deceiving the victim in collusion with two female victims of the above false name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A copy of a bankbook;

1. CCTV closure photographs;

1. A previous conviction: A criminal history inquiry and investigation report (the same type of case).

arrow