1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

The above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

E Co., Ltd. is a business owner who executes the “G” under the contract with the “G” located in the original city, and Defendant A is a general manager who manages the safety and health of workers belonging to the above companies and subcontractor companies working at the above construction site.

Defendant

D Co., Ltd. is a business owner who executes the parts of steel reinforced concrete construction in the above construction from E Co., Ltd. with subcontracting, and Defendant B is a representative of the above company, who manages the safety and health of workers belonging to the above company who work at the work site of steel reinforced concrete construction.

Defendant

C is a driver of the cream belonging to H, who is a person engaged in driving service of an I 25 tons of car trucks and a mobile cream installed on the above truck with the direction of Defendant D at the site of the above construction work.

1. Crimes related to the death of victim J;

A. From September 28, 2017, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C’s occupational injury and death, and the victim J (64) against the Industrial Safety and Health Act in violation of the said Act was a person employed by Defendant A, a corporation affiliated with D on September 28, 2017, with Defendant C and the head of the steel office leader K, etc. at the construction site, using the above mobile cream, and ring them up to the second floor rooftop for cremation.

The number of iron bars to be pulled was about 2 tons of one set, and the victim J was engaged in the work to speed the steel bars to the straw, while the victim J was working for the strawing of the straw truck, and there was a high risk of accidents due to the fall of the object in the case of the string of the straw or the removal of the steel bars.

In such a case, the defendant C, who is the operator of the above mobile cler, shall check the cler prior to the work and check whether the safety devices such as the right to use the cler and the prevention devices such as the excessive load prevention devices work normally, and whether the cler has been cut off.