The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, as regards Defendant B and E, this shall apply.

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. As to the progress of the litigation, the conciliation in the attached sheet was attached.

1) The lower court, among the facts charged against the Defendants, was named as partially a bribe relating to horse riding support (service charges, AT, and after JZ).

The term “AT” is abbreviationd.

Self-, AT insurance premium, AU, AU, "AU" is abbreviationd.

- The term “AV” and “AV” are abbreviationd.

In its own, AU and AV insurance premiums), some of the matters related to horse riding support related to violation of the Act on the AU and AV AV A, etc. of the Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement service charges, AU and AV purchase charges, AU and AV insurance premiums), some of the violation of the Act on the AU and AV of the Specific Economic Crimes (property transfer charges abroad), violation of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Gains from Crimes (hereinafter "Regulation on Concealment of Gains from Crimes"), violation of the Act on the Regulation and Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Gains from Crimes (hereinafter "the Act on the Regulation of Concealment of Gains from Crimes"), violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Concealment of Gains from Crimes, guilty of the violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (hereinafter "the Act on the AU and AV Insurance Premiums"), violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (the promise to offer a bribe, vehicle group and transportation vehicle purchase charges), violation of the Act on the HA support, part of (Embezzlement purchase charges and insurance premiums) purchase charges and overseas funds).

2) In addition, the lower court convicted Defendant A, C, and D of the charge of the offering of bribe related to AW (hereinafter “AW Center”) and the violation of the Act of the Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement), and convicted Defendant A, C, and BF as an incorporated foundation, BG as an incorporated foundation, and BG as an incorporated foundation, and BG as an incorporated foundation, respectively.