logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 11. 14. 선고 2019두47315 판결
(심리불속행) 법인이 직원들의 소득세를 대납하고, 이를 직원들에 대한 인정상여로 임의 계상한 경우 법인의 통상적 손금에 해당된다고 보기 어려움[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu-74343 ( October 26, 2019)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2017west0194 ( December 01, 2016)

Title

(In case a corporation pays the income tax of its employees on behalf of the employees and voluntarily appropriates it for recognition of the employees, it is difficult to regard it as a corporation’s ordinary loss.

Summary

(2) A summary of the corporation's income tax to be paid by its employees may not be recognized as an ordinary loss of the corporation, since there is no evidence to support that the corporation's income tax to be paid by its employees has been appropriated as the corporation's deductible expenses at will, and there is no evidence to support that

Related statutes

Article 19 (Scope of Deductible Expenses)

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2019Du47315 Decided Corporate Tax Imposition, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAAAAAA

Defendant-Appellee

Samsung Head of Samsung Tax Office

Judgment of the court below

Seoul High Court 2018Nu74343

Imposition of Judgment

November 14, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow