logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.07.03 2013고단394
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

Defendant

C. Fines 30,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A has been in office in the defendant corporation E located in Ansan-gu from around July 2010 to around July 14, 2012, and the defendant B served as an employee in the above Mart land division from August 2009 to July 14, 2012.

1. Defendant A expressed the place of origin of imported livestock products at the above Mat-to-be display venue, etc., with an intention to sell the imported livestock products to customers who found the Mat-to-be in Korea.

Defendant

A around August 1, 2010, around August 2010, ordered employees of the above Mat-to-land Hat-to-date Co., Ltd. to indicate imported mountain products, such as the U.S. Bags, Canada's Canadian Bags, Chile's labs, U.S. Mags, U.S. Mags, and U.S. Mags, which were purchased from the above Mat-to-date Co., Ltd., Ltd., as domestic products. The employees ordered Defendant A, upon the instructions of Defendant A, indicated the place of origin in the display site, etc., and sold the said Mags to many unspecified consumers who visited the said Mags in disguised manner by falsely indicating the country of origin of the imported livestock products of a total amount of KRW 854,982,400,00 in the market price from September 1, 2010 to February 20, 2013.

As a result, Defendant A and other employees of the above M&A made false labeling of the origin of agricultural and fishery products in collusion.

2. Defendant B received instructions from Defendant A from May 26, 2012 to July 14, 2012, and sold the said marina to an unspecified number of consumers who visited the said marina by falsely indicating the origin of the imported livestock products amounting to KRW 39,618,543 in total, as indicated in the attached list of crimes (2) in the same manner as indicated in paragraph (1), as indicated in the attached list of crimes (2).

Accordingly, Defendant B conspiredd with A to indicate the origin of agricultural and fishery products.

3. Defendant C Co., Ltd. did not commit the above offenses.

arrow