logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.13 2015구합69164
관리처분계획취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a housing reconstruction association established to implement a housing reconstruction project in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J 47,501 square meters (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”), and obtained authorization for the establishment from the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 4, 2010 from the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The Plaintiffs are owners of land, etc. who owned real estate in the instant rearrangement zone.

B. The Defendant initially held a general meeting of shareholders on April 28, 2012 and formulated a project implementation plan (hereinafter “the initial project implementation plan”) with the consent of 279 members from among the 372 members, and received authorization from the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on March 27, 2013.

C. The Defendant received the application for parcelling-out from May 31, 2013 to July 15, 2013, the Plaintiffs did not apply for parcelling-out within the said period.

On October 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) held a special general meeting on October 24, 2013; (b) formulated a project implementation change plan with the consent of 293 members among all the 318 members, which changes the project cost, the number of newly-built house, the number of households of the newly-built house, and the number of households of the house scale; and (c) obtained the approval of the project implementation plan from

E. On March 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) held an ordinary general meeting on March 31, 2015; (b) formulated a management and disposition plan with the consent of 291 members among the 319 members (hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”); and (c) received a disposition from the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office on April 24,

F. The main contents of the “project cost”, “design outline of a new building” or “the number of households of a newly-built house” or “the number of households of a newly-built house” and “the number of households of a house size”, which are the Defendant’s telegraphs, indicated in the written consent for establishment of the association proposed by the Plaintiffs, and the initial project implementation plan and implementation plan.

arrow