The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The gist of the prosecutor's grounds of appeal is as follows: E, the counterpart driver of the instant case, was unaware of the fact that the vehicle was faced before the police contact, was not discovered in the vehicle of E, the materials charged on the Defendant's driving vehicle are not different from the substance of the accident, and the contents of the estimate submitted by the Defendant to the insurance company are not different from the content of the accident. However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of this error of law, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, is erroneous.

2. Determination:

A. We examine ex officio the grounds for appeal by the defendant prior to determining ex officio.

At the trial of the public prosecutor, the facts constituting the crime of this case in the facts charged as follows: around 12:50 on October 14, 201, the defendant claimed insurance money by submitting a medical certificate and quotation to the victim lot damage insurance company that caused the above SM5 driver's string part of the Fgalle vehicle operated by E while driving the DM5 vehicle in front of the U.S. P. C in front of the U.S. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P.P., P.P., P. P., the Defendant and P.