logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.10 2014고단1968
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2014, at around 00:26, the Defendant, at around 00:26, expressed a desire for drunk families in the Defendant’s residence in Gwangju Northern-gu, and received a report of 112 during the process of having avoided a disturbance, and transported the said E’s chest by hand from the background E belonging to the Gwangju Northern Police Station D District, who was called for the disturbance.

계속하여 피고인은 그곳 거실에 놓인 화분을 벽에 던져 깨뜨리고 안방으로 들어가 그곳에 놓인 책상을 뒤집어엎는 등 소란을 피워 위 지구대 소속 순경 F으로부터 제지를 받자 “너 같이 어린놈이 뭘 아냐, 너 같이 어린놈은 머리를 쳐 버려야 한다. 너 같은 새끼들은 다 죽여야 한다.”라고 욕설을 하면서 방바닥에 놓여 있던 필통을 집어 위 F의 얼굴을 향해 던질 듯이 들어올렸다.

In addition, the Defendant took a house to get an investigation by moving to the D zone with the above police officers, and took the face of the above F, who was frighting to the face of the above F, f, who was f, who moved to the seat of the Defendant, and directed him, and kneeeed with knee, who is willing to walk the back of the above F.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the above E/F, a police officer, and obstructed his/her legitimate performance of his/her duties on dispatch duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the prosecutor's statement of E (Evidence List No. 1);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act requires a strict punishment in that the defendant does not know himself/herself during the period of probation due to the crime of fraud, but reaches the crime of this case. However, the defendant is deeply against his/her own crime during the period of detention, and damages therefrom.

arrow