logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.04 2019가합568575
부당이득반환 청구의 소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 당사자들의 지위 원고는 1977년경 설립되어 토목건축공사업 등을 영위하는 법인이고, 피고는 토지의 취득, 개발, 비축, 공급, 도시의 개발, 정비, 주택의 건설, 공급, 관리 업무를 수행함으로써 국민주거생활의 향상과 국토의 효율적인 이용을 도모하여 국민경제의 발전에 이바지함을 목적으로 한국토지주택공사법에 의하여 설립된 법인이다.

B. On July 2, 2019, the Defendant announced the supply of the instant land and filed an application by the Plaintiff (1) on July 2, 2019, the Defendant announced the supply of the instant land with respect to the multi-family housing site B (727 households) block C block 48,103 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). The main contents are as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as the "Public Notice of this case"). On July 2, 2019, the public notice of the supply of the site for multi-family housing (C): 1st on July 2, 2019 (C): July 25, 2019: 2nd: httpp of the KIC on July 29, 2019; d DDD B (2) on July 25, 2019; 201-28-0102 FD A: The Plaintiff did not receive an application for supply of the land of this case from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation on July 29, 2019; and the Defendant did not notify the Plaintiff of the subscription to supply the land of the price of this case on July 28, 2019.

C. (1) The Plaintiff did not conclude the instant land contract with the Defendant for a period from August 9, 2019 to August 16, 2019, which was to conclude the instant contract on the instant public announcement.

(2) On August 19, 2019, the Plaintiff paid 2.8 billion won of the subscription amount to the Defendant instead of the D Association, and the Defendant confiscated the said money.

(3) On August 28, 2019 and September 4, 2019, the Defendant again announced the supply of the instant land, but did not appear by the purchaser, and on September 28, 2019, the Defendant did not appear.

arrow