beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 30, 1988, Plaintiff A was appointed as a school teacher and promoted to the school officer on March 17, 2003.
Plaintiff
B was appointed as a school teacher on June 26, 1992 and promoted to the school officer on June 26, 2007.
Plaintiff
C was appointed as a school teacher on April 1, 2004 and promoted to the school officer on April 1, 2015.
Plaintiff
D was appointed as a teaching school on January 7, 2013.
The plaintiffs worked in the E prison Security Department around July 2016.
B. On July 25, 2016, at the time of the special inspection (hereinafter “instant inspection”) at a 4-work site entrusted in the E prison (hereinafter “instant work site”), Plaintiff A, C, and D performed the inspection, and Plaintiff B performed the duty of supervisory assistance.
C. On August 8, 2016, a case was arrested by using a bridge that was created in advance by a prisoner F (entrusted 4 workplaces) with a string used for work (it was made between August 3, 2016 and August 5, 2016, and was kept under the personal working unit inside the workplace).
Based on the plaintiffs' confirmation, CCTV image analysis report, F's statement statement, etc., the defendant issued a disciplinary measure on December 22, 2016 against plaintiffs C and D for the reduction of salary, and the plaintiff A and B for each reprimand on the ground that the plaintiffs violated their duty of good faith at the time of the prosecutor of this case (Article 56 of the State Public Officials Act).
(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The grounds for the disciplinary action are as follows.
[Plaintiff A, C, C, and D opened an object of prisoners for 12 minutes from 16:51 to 17:03 at the time of the instant inspection. Only a formal inspection at the level of view of work units in front of the work unit, which was gathered at the entrance of the workplace, and only was gathered at the entrance of the workplace, and did not closely check the personal work unit of the prisoner who is easy to conceal illegal goods, and therefore, F did not find any bridge parts, keyss, trens, etc. that were separated from the work unit to build a shooting bridge for escape.
[Plaintiff B] At the time of the inspection of this case, Plaintiff B is subject to G (Entry supervisor).