logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.01.11 2016고정1186
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a BS-type car under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.054% while under the influence of alcohol, from the roads near the 539 west-ro, south-west, west-ro, 539 to the ridge park near the ridge park located in 548 at the same time; and (b) the Defendant driven a BS-type car under the influence of alcohol content of blood.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) was a person who is engaged in driving a car in the given SP area, driving the said car at the time of the day specified in paragraph 1, and driving it along the two-lanes of the three-lanes, one of which is one of the three-lanes, adjacent to the floor park as stated in paragraph 1, at the lower

At the time, the defendant was under the duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by securing a distance from a collision with the front vehicle when the vehicle stops or reduces speed, as the victim C (59) who is driving on the same side was driving. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle was obliged to pay a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by securing a distance from a collision with the front vehicle when the vehicle stops or stops speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and driven while under the influence of alcohol content 0.054% in blood, and received the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle, which was stopped in accordance with the new code at the front of the Defendant’s frontline, as well as the part on the rear part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to victims E (V, 58 years of age) who were on board the victim and the victim’s vehicle due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report or a report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts; Article 268 of the Criminal Act; Article 148-2(2)3 and 44(1)1 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow