The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and reflects his mistake in depth, the crime of this case is deemed to have been administered once a phiphone, the crime of this case has not been delivered to another person, and the defendant has had the record of being punished several times by the crime of phiphone medication in favor of the defendant, and in particular, the defendant had been sentenced on July 13, 2012 to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime on July 13, 2012 and has been sentenced for two years and six months, and the punishment is deemed to have been determined by the court below taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the sentencing of the same and similar cases. In addition, considering the various circumstances, considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.