The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year and eight months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is deemed to be too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below committed the crime of this case including the confession of all of the crime of this case, the crime of this case was committed in a simple medication of phiphone, the crime of this case was committed by the investigative agency, the statement of a person who supplied phiphones to the investigation agency, etc., and the crime of this case was committed in favor of the defendant, but the crime of this case was committed three times with three phiphones and three times with three gramphones, and the defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment for 12 times in total including the past punished twice for the same crime of this case. In particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case, such as the administration of phiphonephones, which was sentenced for 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and was committed by the court below in consideration of the sentencing of the same similar case. Considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the defendant's age after the crime of this case, the defendant's personality and behavior, and various circumstances revealed in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.