Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on the road in front of the Kim Tae-Jung Park Park in the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic
I would like to pay the full-time money in October after shipping the goods.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the injured party.
As such, between May 22, 2015 and June 30, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.4 million in total from the victim to the C’s account under the name of C, under the pretext of borrowing money, on a total of four occasions.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against B;
1. A copy of passbook (National Bank B);
1. A copy of a statement of financial transactions with the principal;
1. A copy of an inquiry about all details of savings transactions;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a deposit transaction;
1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the crime of this case are as follows: (a) there is no record of being sentenced to imprisonment exceeding the same kind of power or fine; and (b) there was an agreement with the victim during the trial of this case; and (c) the woman’s wife against the defendant is prior to the defendant.