logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.01.25 2016고단2100
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the branch office of the C Association, and the victim D shall be a member of the E Council.

C On March 5, 2015, the employee F, dismissed by the credit branch of the Association, received a civil petition for the illegal receipt of the subsidy for disabled activity support to the above branch in the audit office of the above branch on March 5, 2015, and on the 12th of the same month, the credit and the National Pension Service inspected the illegal receipt of the subsidy jointly with the above branch, and the same year.

6. On 18. 18. The mother of G, a intellectually disabled person, visited H for viewing female water and voluntarily reported the fact that H was in good faith. On the 19th of the same month, I also acknowledged the fact that H had worked as an assistant to the above G’s activities.

On the other hand, on April 10, 2015, the Defendant reported to the effect that “G father has sexual assaulted G” is a sexual assault counseling center where the victim D was working as an operating member through the elderly with female viewing disability. Accordingly, G was consulted at the sexual assault counseling center for about three months, and the same was the same.

C. On July of the same year, it was diagnosed as to whether sexual assault was inflicted on another hospital prior to women's 24. At the request of the National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea on July of the same year, it was sexual assaulted by a professional counselor and counseling with the professional counselor at the Southern Sea Center of the Republic of Korea.

The circumstances of suspicion have not been confirmed.

Nevertheless, on June 9, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice on the bulletin board of the E Council website, which can be seen by anyone access, stating that “No one had engaged in human rights ties against persons with disabilities and illegal business of embezzlement of subsidies and illegal receipt of subsidies without any organization with disabilities,” thereby impairing honor by the same method as the list of crimes in attached Form seven times from that time until April 1, 2016.

As a result, the defendant up to seven times in total to defame the victim, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by disclosing false information openly through information and communications networks.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow