1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

The first instance court judgment which changed the first instance court judgment No. 5 to “The two appeals were dismissed (Seoul High Court Decision 2014Na6060),” and changed to “Defendant’s signature” the first instance court judgment No. 7, which changed to “Defendant B’s signature,” and changed to “Defendant B’s signature,” the first instance court judgment No. 6 through No. 19 as follows. 8, first, as to the existence of the basic power of representation against C, the following changes were examined: (i) No. 8-1, 2, 3, 9, 11-2; (ii) Defendant B did not appear to have the right to establish a provisional registration under the Act on Real Estate No. 10, Nov. 2, 2010; (iii) Defendant B did not have the right to establish a provisional registration under the Act on Real Estate No. 1, 1040, 300, 300, 300, 300, 300, 300.