A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2017, the Defendant: (a) listened to the statement that “the lending may be made by accumulating the account transaction performance; (b) the account number is informed to secure the transaction performance; and (c) no one causes anyone to obtain a loan by accumulating the fact that the fraud by means of another’s account is character and performance; and (d) there is no case where the Defendant requires a medium of access to electronic financial transactions; (b) knowing that there is no case where a person in the name was aware of the fact that he/she received money from another account held in advance by means of false or fraudulent means, such as lending, goods transaction, misrepresentation of investigation agency, etc.; and (c) knowingly, he/she was willing to assist the Defendant in committing the crime of fraud of a name-free box by directly withdrawing the money deposited in the Defendant’s account so that the person in the name-based name may receive the amount of damage from the Defendant’s account.

On August 18, 2017, the name Buddhistist made a false statement to the effect that “a loan may be made at a low interest rate, but in order to do so, he/she shall receive a loan from other financial rights and make a deposit from the victim C by telephoneing the victim C at a non-displace on August 18, 2017,” and that the victim is the same year from the victim.

8. Around 22.2. Around 20.m., he/she acquired the remittance of KRW 9 million to the Daegu Bank Account (D) in the name of the Defendant.

In order to assist a person in the name of the defendant in acquiring by remittance nine million won or more as above, the defendant shall do so.

8. 22. At the same location of the Daegu Bank located in Busan-ro 235, Daegu-ro, Daegu-ro, Daegu-ro, withdrawal of KRW 9 million, which was remitted from the damage to the Daegu Bank account under the Defendant’s name, and delivered to the party in default of his name.

Accordingly, the Defendant made it easy to commit the crime of fraud of the above-mentioned person without his name, and prevented it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s authenticitys, written statements 1.