logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.05.11 2018고단136
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 3, 2017, the Defendant received a proposal from a person in a name-free name to “to grant a loan by increasing transaction performance, such as remitting money deposited in the current account to the designated account.” On March 30, 2017, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the money deposited in the post office account under the Defendant’s name was a fraud aiding and abetting crime on the ground that he withdrawn the singish damage deposited in the sing account and delivered it to the name-free person on the ground that he was given a loan by raising the transaction performance from the person who misrepresented his employee of the lending company around March 30, 2017, and that he was under investigation on the ground that he withdrawn the singish damage deposited in the singish account under the name of the Defendant and then transferred it to the name-free person.

On November 14, 2017, where the victim did not have an intention or ability to provide a loan, the person under whose name the crime was committed shall be 82,970,000 won in total from five members of the victim's total number, as stated in the list of crimes in the separate list of crimes, and the defendant, on November 14, 2017, by telephoneing the victim D at an unspecified place, and, on November 12, 2017, "a loan granted by the Government exists, if a part of the amount of the existing loan is repaid, it would be possible to lend up to 75 million won if a part of the repayment is forwarded, and it would be possible to do so up to 75 million won if a portion of the repayment is forwarded." The defendant, at around 10,000 won, received 10,970,000 won in total from the victim's account under the name of the victim, 30:00 won in the name of the bank under the name of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting (not confirmation of a gold account);

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the punishment for imprisonment.

arrow