logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 04. 12. 선고 2017두75477 판결
(심리불속행) 해외비상장주식을 상속세및증여세법상의 보충적 평가방법으로 평가함에 있어 과세관청이 입증을 다하였다 할 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-68600 ( December 08, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho-2014-west-1593 (Law No. 15, 2015)

Title

(Recompetence of Trial) The tax authority may not prove the foreign non-listed stocks as supplementary evaluation methods under the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act.

Summary

(Main) In assessing foreign non-listed stocks, the evaluation by supplementary evaluation methods or appraisal reports under the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act is inappropriate, and the application by first out method is not absolutely appropriate for the order of appropriation of surplus funds of dividends.

Related statutes

Article 54 of the Corporate Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow