logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.03.22 2018고정13
협박등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the regular director of C (hereinafter “instant company”) and Defendant B was the employee of the instant company, and the victim D (n, 32 years of age) was the victim D, and the victim E (n, 30 years of age) was the driver of the instant vehicle. The victim E (n, 30 years of age) was the victim D.

On June 24, 2017, from around 18:30 to 21:25, the Defendants stated the place of crime in the indictment that “the Defendant A’s vehicle is inside” in the office of the instant company, which remodeled the vehicle located in the YF’s parking lot. However, according to the records of the instant case, the Defendants appears to be a clerical error in the C’s office that remodeled the vehicle.

Therefore, it is determined that such recognition does not bring about any substantial disadvantage to the defense of the Defendants, and therefore, the above place of crime should be stated without any amendment to the indictment.

At this point, Defendant A, who had been talked about the problem of the cost of dealing with the victims and sirenscar accident, called “the cost of dealing with the accident will be increased in cash. On the other hand, Defendant B, who called “I will not pay the increased amount of money because there is no foreigner’s residence and there is no foreigner’s place of residence. I will not do so. I will know you will you will do so. I will do so. I will know you will you will do. I will you will you will do so.” Defendant B, who had referred to in Defendant A, threatened the victims, such as “I would know you will do it before or after the arrival of the sex. I will not have any money.” During the same period, the victims would not leave the above office until the victims paid the cost of dealing with the accident.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to threaten the victims and detained them.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement made by the witness E in this Court;

1. Statement of statement E prepared by the police officer;

1. Entry of a written complaint of E;

1. A motor vehicle lease contract;

arrow