1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the claim for revocation of the decision on disclosure of information against the chief of the Defendant B police station and the Defendants.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 19, 201, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against C and D with the investigation officer, etc. on the charge of fraud, etc. On October 6, 201, the Plaintiff filed a petition for objection to request the B police station to replace a person in charge of investigation by asserting that E, a person in charge of investigation of the instant accusation, did not investigate fairly (hereinafter “instant petition for objection”).

(2) On October 5, 201, the above police station F reduction was in charge of the investigation of the above case from October 7, 201. On October 31, 2011, the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office filed a non-prosecution disposition against D's suspicion of partial fraud (defluence of evidence), and issued a non-prosecution disposition against D's suspicion of fraud (defluence of evidence). 2) The Plaintiff filed a complaint against C, G, and E on November 5, 201, and investigated the facts and circumstances of the complaint by the abuse of authority and the obstruction of exercise of right. On November 5, 2011, the defendant B police station sent the above case to the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office by non-prosecution opinion (defluence of complaint).

3) On November 16, 201, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Incheon Regional Police Agency by asserting that the investigation officer of each of the above accusation cases, E, F, and H had conducted an illegal and unjust investigation. On January 6, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the said three parties, claiming that the investigation officer of the above accusation case was involved in the investigation, and that the application was filed on January 6, 2012. The details of the Incheon Regional Police Agency I took charge of internal investigation of the instant case (hereinafter “instant internal investigation case”).

(B) On April 23, 2012, the Commissioner of the Incheon Local Police Agency concluded the internal investigation on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize the charge of a crime on April 9, 2012. (B) The Plaintiff filed a request for information disclosure on the records of the instant internal investigation case with the Commissioner of the Incheon Local Police Agency.

On April 27, 2012, the Commissioner of the Incheon Local Police Agency decided to disclose information on the records of the instant internal investigation case.

2. The Plaintiff is the Defendant on June 11, 2012.