logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2015.09.17 2014가단26532
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who filed a complaint with G and H as follows. The Defendants are police officers of the Daegu Northern Police Station I Team investigating the Plaintiff’s above accusation case.

B. On June 13, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Daegu Northern Police Station on the grounds that “G posted three times on the bulletin board of “J” (hereinafter “J”) from April 27, 2011 to June 7, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against G to the Daegu Northern Police Station on charges of violating the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation). Upon receiving the prosecutor’s investigation under the direction of the public prosecutor affiliated with the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Defendant B investigated K’s witness, etc., and sent it to the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office on September 6, 201, on the ground that the act of posting the three instances above was in charge of violating the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection (hereinafter “Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network, etc.”). On November 15, 2011, the public prosecutor decided to post the Plaintiff’s defamation on the Internet bulletin board, etc. (hereinafter “Defendant 216G”).”

When Defendant C had a person in charge of the above accusation case under the direction of the public prosecutor belonging to Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office, on December 19, 201, he applied the above accusation as an insulting offense, and filed a complaint six months after he became aware of the offender, and sent it to the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office without the authority to prosecute.

On December 22, 2011, the prosecutor made a decision that the prosecutor has no right to prosecute the above suspicion.

3) On November 28, 2011, the Plaintiff posted G on September 7, 2011, to November 25, 2011, “from September 7, 2011 to November 25, 2011, it has damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation on the bulletin board of the “J”, an Internet car page, five times.”

arrow