logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고단1589
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:50 on May 15, 2018, and (b) around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) carried out drinking with the victim B (40 years of age) who is an employee at a restaurant and carried out drinking with the victim on the ground that the victim’s face is against wage problem; and (b) carried out the 2 to 3 occasions of drinking with the victim’s face, the Defendant inflicted injury on the left-hand left-hand side of the victim, such as an internal seat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, set up a ploss indicating ploss, which are dangerous objects on the tables, as hand, and laid down the ploss to the victim A (45 arches) and was suitable for the victim, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant, carrying dangerous objects, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A complaint and a written statement;

1. Photographs taken of motters to arrest the suspect to commit the crime;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Act, Article 261 and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The reasoning for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that each of the crimes in the judgment of the court below is not good because the Defendants, between the cafeteria president and the employees, were sprinked by having sprinked, causing an injury to the other party or leading up to a sprink, which is a dangerous article. Defendant A has a history of having been sentenced to a fine for an injury, and Defendant B is several times of criminal records of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and a fine due to an act of violence, injury, damage, etc. Defendant B. Defendant B commits the crime without being informed of during the period of suspension of execution. All of the o Defendants were aware of the mistake during the period of suspension of execution. o and agree with each other. Article 51 of the Criminal Act is Article 51.

arrow