Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2013, the Defendant repaid the Defendant’s debt to the Victim C (Y, 34 years of age), the obligee, according to the decision to recommend the implementation of the Vice-Support of the Incheon District Court. However, there was a conflict between the Defendant and the victim, seeking to recover some of the money from the damaged party.

1. Intimidation;

A. On March 28, 2015, the Defendant would receive an amount equivalent to KRW 11.8 million by using his/her mobile phone from the Gu building 1203, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, 2015. The Defendant will also receive an amount equivalent to KRW 11.8 million by the date of payment.

The sender shall send a face-to-face.

The four addresses are known.

It is a free person.

“To receive money,” and “to receive money.”

People are not people, but people are not in danger.

The victim threatened the victim by transmitting the text message to the cellular phone of the victimized person.

B. On March 29, 2015, the Defendant sent Kakao Stockholm messages to the victim, using his cell phone at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) on March 29, 2015, to the effect that “the victim will start from the Kakao-gu F of the Madon-si, Madon-si, Madon-si, Madon-si, the end.”

(c)

On April 1, 2015, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) around April 1, 2015, the Defendant identified the four addresses of the victims using his mobile phone at the same place as the above paragraph (a).

The author written comments on the purport that “I see.....” and made intimidation to the victim.

(d)

Defendant at around 11:50 on April 4, 2015, at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) above, “Nee” in G Kakao Guo Guide, the birth of the victim, using his mobile phone at the same place as that described in the same paragraph

E.N.N.N.T.

There is no question as to how they are within, and how they would be, written comments on the purport that “I am fab.” and “I amfab.” and the content thereof was delivered to the victim, thereby threatening the victim.

2. The Defendant’s insultd on April 1, 2015, using his mobile phone at the same place as that described in paragraph 1(a) at the same time.