The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The grounds for appeal (a year of imprisonment and an additional collection) by the lower court are too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below, on the grounds that the defendant recognized the crime at the investigation stage, the medical expenses are compensated for the defendant at the investigation stage, and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant, the defendant did not have any record of having been sentenced, and the shotphones were administered together with the defendant during the police investigation, and the defendant had the same kind of criminal records, and the crime in this case was committed during the period of suspension of execution due to drug crimes, and was committed during the period of suspension of execution, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., were comprehensively considered, and sentenced to the lowest sentence according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court.

The grounds for unfair sentencing alleged by the Defendant appear to be the circumstances that the lower court had already taken into account when determining the Defendant’s punishment. The lower court’s punishment is reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion, and there are no circumstances suggesting that the said sentencing conditions have been changed in the appellate court.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted, since the court below's punishment is too heavy.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.