logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.06.28 2018고합29
특수공무집행방해치상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CDa-May Road Vehicles.

On December 27, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on December 27, 2017, and operated one way in front of the E-cafeteria in Samsung Hotel to D’s department store on the surface of Samsung Hotel, and discovered police officers who are under drinking control in the front bank, and led them to avoid this.

Since there are many vehicles parked towards both sides of the road, in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly operating the next direction and operating the steering system in the future.

Nevertheless, in order to avoid drinking control by neglecting this, the Defendant left a vehicle owned by the victim F-owned G G G 7 boarding that was parked on the right side of the Defendant’s moving back to the right side of the vehicle and destroyed the vehicle owned by the victim to have an amount equivalent to KRW 2,204,057, the Defendant left the vehicle immediately and escaped without taking necessary measures, even though the Defendant neglected to stop the vehicle, which was parked on the right side of the Defendant’s moving back to the right side of the vehicle.

2. The Defendant suffered interference with the performance of special duties at the time, time, and place indicated in paragraph 1 as above, and thereafter caused the accident, and the Defendant sent the Defendant’s vehicle stop signal at the police station guard, and the Defendant’s front of the Defendant’s vehicle by sending the Defendant’s vehicle stop signal to the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant, the Defendant, refusing to comply with it, proceeded with the multi-user boom, which is a dangerous object, as it is, in order to prevent the Defendant from doing so. In order to stop the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) 1, 1, 30 meters of the bareboat boom, 1, 1, and 30 meters of the bareboat bareboat b

Accordingly, the defendant uses freight vehicles, which are dangerous objects, to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes, traffic control, etc. of police officers.

arrow