beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. On July 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:30 on July 10, 2014, at the Goyang-gu Goyang Police Station Down-gu, Goyang-gu; (b) reported the father of the Defendant, who was under contact with him as a matter of taxi articles and charges and was found as a police box, and tried to go out of the police box.
Accordingly, according to the Defendant, the police officer E, who belongs to the above police box, was boomed with the Defendant, and was pushed down with the Defendant’s hand.
The Defendant continued to blap the eggs, such as tear tear, etc., while taking the bath “A, B,” and blaped F, and plicked F’s arms by hand with plucking, plucking F’s arms, and blaping them.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officers' legitimate performance of their duties on the duty of global security, maintenance of order, etc.
2. On July 23, 2014, the Defendant, around 03:30 on July 23, 2014, 2014, assaulted the victim’s grandchildren by her hand on two occasions, on the ground that the victim H (Nam, 20 years of age) in front of a male toilet located in Yongsan-gu G in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Goyang-si, and that the victim H (Seoul and 20 years of age) would be bad.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
2. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to E, F and H;
1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;
2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.
3. Selection of a fine for negligence;
4. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act.
5. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.
6. The crime of this case committed during the period of repeated offense is an element of sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, such as: (a) the act of a police officer who performs his/her duties to take a bath or use violence against a police officer who performs his/her duties to ensure the safety of citizens and maintain social order; and (b) the Defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated offense.
On the other hand, the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and runs counter to depth.