logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 9. 30. 선고 2014누48711 판결
[공무원재직기간합산불승인처분취소][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

See Attached List 1 (Law Firm LLC et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

The Government Employees Pension Service

Conclusion of Pleadings

August 19, 2014

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap22598 decided April 3, 2014

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The decision of the first instance court shall be revoked. Alternatively, the defendant's disposition of non-approval for adding up each service period to each service period for the plaintiffs on each disposition date listed in the attached Table 2 list is revoked, or the plaintiffs are in the position of a person who has the right to receive a retirement pension corresponding to the period

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the statement of the reasons for the decision of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all Justices.

[Attachment]

Judges Lee Young-chul (Presiding Judge)

arrow