Plaintiff and appellant
See Attached List 1 (Law Firm LLC et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
The Government Employees Pension Service
Conclusion of Pleadings
August 19, 2014
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap22598 decided April 3, 2014
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The decision of the first instance court shall be revoked. Alternatively, the defendant's disposition of non-approval for adding up each service period to each service period for the plaintiffs on each disposition date listed in the attached Table 2 list is revoked, or the plaintiffs are in the position of a person who has the right to receive a retirement pension corresponding to the period
Reasons
The court's explanation of this case is identical to the statement of the reasons for the decision of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all Justices.
[Attachment]
Judges Lee Young-chul (Presiding Judge)