1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The court's explanation about this case is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part concerning which appeal is made under Paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance trial, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial are examined, the fact-finding and the judgment of the first instance court are justifiable). If the second sentence of the second sentence of the first instance, the “Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers” in the 13th sentence of the second sentence of the second sentence of the second sentence shall be amended as “Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26808, Dec. 30, 2015; hereinafter “Enforcement

The part of the first instance judgment, i.e., “(1) new market (22 days) process,” etc., was discovered during the first instance judgment from Nos. 14 to 11, shall be as follows.

“(1) At least three previous recruitment courses, two unsatisfyed trainees have been paid for training expenses (the Plaintiff shall be treated as having completed the intended recruitment course from August 12, 2013 to September 11, 2013, and the Plaintiff shall be paid training expenses by treating the trainee B as having completed the training course from August 12, 2013 to September 11, 2013, but upon verifying the completion of the training course, B shall be present on August 12, 2013, and the remaining period was unsatisfy, and the completion of the training course from May 7, 2014 to June 3, 2014 was completed. However, according to the completion of the training course, D shall be present for 90,000 days and shall not be present for 11 days and shall not be present for 10 days.

[] Cases where a false treatment has been made as having been completed by one unsatisfy trainee (from April 29, 2015 to 2015)

5. During the process of verifying customer information (8.60h) by December, 12, E was treated as having been completed, but according to the attendance book, E was not present from April 29, 2015, and completed due to its failure to appear.

(2) present.