logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.06.27 2019고합51
일반건조물방화미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 7, 2019, at around 23:10, the Defendant, in his mother living together, tried to remove part of the dry field owned by the Defendant into E and telephone, as a matter of using or making profits from a mixed house in his mother’s house Mara, 2019, the Defendant: (a) after hearing the phrase “small father, her father, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, scoper, and scoper in his house; (b) after piling up the house in his possession, the Defendant did not report the intention of extinguishing the above house on the floor of the fire on the 19th place and did not report the intention of extinguishing the fire on the floor of the fire.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on crimes;

1. Articles 174 and 166 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 52 (1) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of self-denunciation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration considered favorable to the reasons for sentencing as follows);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for one year to 15 years;

2. Scope of recommending sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not apply to an attempted crime.

3. The Defendant, who received the sentence, was sentenced to death in the house in which her married person was living, and subsequently attempted.

In light of the fact that the crime of this case was likely to cause a major risk to neighboring residents' lives and bodies, the nature of the crime is not good.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and is against it.

arrow