logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.11 2015고단6560
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On September 3, 2015, A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution in the Incheon District Court on September 3, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 11, 2015.

"The 2015 Highest 6560": Defendant A calls from the victim G on January 2012, 201 to do so, and Defendant A is able to pay the principal on the face of the loan of business funds to the victim G, and pay the interest on the second part of each month.

The sale of a company run by the domestic corporation is entitled to KRW 4 billion, and even if the business is well known, it is possible to repay the borrowed money with the sale of the company.

However, in fact, the Defendant had no profit due to the business depression of H (State) operated at the time, and there was no intention or ability to repay the amount even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to the absence of any particular property.

On January 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received KRW 10 million from the damaged party to the bank account in the name of the Defendant’s name as the borrowed money; (c) and (d) received a total of KRW 87 million from around that time to May 25, 2012 from around 10 to around 2012 as the borrowed money as indicated in the separate crime list; and (d) received and acquired the money from the Defendant to the bank account in the name of the Defendant’s name.

"2016 Goman 1506": Defendant A is the representative of (ju) I who supplies vehicle goods, such as black boxes, to Gags, and Defendant B is the operator of the J who supplies vehicle goods, such as black boxes, to the above (ju) I.

On April 2014, the Defendants received money from the victim K as the purchase price for vehicle goods to be supplied from the victim K to the (State) I and conspired to use money for the purpose of Defendant A’s personal debt repayment, etc.

According to the above public offering, Defendant B, on April 2014, called “(State) I” to the victim by telephone at the top of the police station in the middle of 2014, L for the vehicle product.

arrow