logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.03.24 2015고단1419
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an operator of "D" in Gangnam-si C and the first floor, and Defendant B is an employee of the above game site.

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, from August 8, 2015 to August 23, 2015, Defendant A alone and from August 24, 2015 to the same year.

9. 2. 경까지 피고인들은 공모하여, 위 ‘D ‘에서 ’ 골드 샷‘ 게임 기 45대를 설치하여 운영하면서 그곳에 온 불상의 손님들이 게임기 위에 비치된 똑딱이를 사용하는 등 게임 물의 이용을 통해 획득한 아이템 카드를 피고인 A 또는 피고인 B이 1장 당 4,500원( 수 수료 10% 공제 )에 환전해 주는 등 게임 물의 이용을 통해 획득한 유ㆍ무형의 결과물을 환전하는 행위를 업으로 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing money exchange;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of respective Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant A, and the fine for Defendant B, respectively,

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. The observation of protection and community service order (defendant A) Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation (Defendant A) Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) has the same record of being sentenced to a fine for 2010 and 2013 as the same crime, and Defendant B has the record of being sentenced to a fine for 2013 as the same crime. The Defendants reflect the fact that they have no record of committing a crime exceeding a fine, and the period of and degree of participation in the crime is determined in consideration of the fact that the Defendants reflects

arrow