logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.09 2017고단171
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A and B Imprisonment, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,000,00, respectively.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the unemployment of the head of Ulsan Jung-gu F and the second floor "G" game room located, and the defendant A is the so-called president of the head of the above game room, and the defendant C is an employee who works for money exchange and money exchange customers in the above game room.

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

From June 2016 to June 25, 2016, the Defendants installed a total of 90 games, including 60 games for “new posters losses” and 30 games for “space transfer” in the above Chapter, and requested unspecified customers to refund the game scores obtained by inserting cash in the above game machine and then exchange them in cash after deducting 10% from commission fees.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Written statements of J, K, L, and M;

1. A criminal investigation report (one-time 36);

1. As a result of appraisal, replies and the application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of the punishment against Defendant A and B, imprisonment with prison labor, and fine against Defendant C, respectively;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant C);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order (defendant A) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 1010, Jan. 1, 2001) provides that the Defendants’ liability shall not be less than those of the Defendants in light of the harm and injury of the instant crime itself, including the promotion of speculation and the acquisition

arrow